Wolf Song of Alaska News
>>Wolves in General
>>Wolves of Denali
>>Wolves in the Lower 48
>>Wolves in Canada
>>The Mexican Wolf
>>The Red Wolf
>>Wolf Tracking
>>Coyote
>>Fox
>>Dingo
>>Animals Sharing Wolf Habitat
>>Wolfdogs in Alaska
>>Canis lupus familiaris
>>Wolf Poems
>>Wolf Distribution
>>Wolves in Afghanistan
>>Wolves in Africa
>>Wolves in Europe
>>Wolves in China
>>Wolves in Iran
>>Wolves in Japan
>>Wolves in Mongolia
>>Wolves in Tasmania
>>Wolves in South Asia
>>Wolves in Scandinavia
>>Wolves in Russia
>>Wolves in South America
>>Wolves Where???
>>Feral Children
>>Miscellaneous Topics
>>Wolf Academy
>>Wolves & Humans
>>Predator & Prey
>>Wolves & Native Americans
>>Wolves for Kids
>>Wolves & Folklore
>>Wolves in Business
>>Wolves in Religion
>>Wolves in War
>>Wolves in Games
>>Wolves in the Arts
>>The Wolf in Fiction
>>Wolves in Medicine

spacer

 

Help the McNeil Bear Sanctuary off linmits to hunting


Game Board Actions Unscientific, Extreme

Letters / Juneau Empire / April 13, 2009

Ted Spraker's recent column on predator control proves that the Game Board's recent actions are unscientific and extreme (Predator management benefits all, Juneau Empire, April 7). Many people oppose the Board's unnecessary and drastic measures. They think the Board is out of touch with most Alaskans.

Since 2003, the Board has approved the largest predator control program since statehood. It encompasses nearly 70,000 square miles - an area larger than many states - and annually targets hundreds of wolves and bears for elimination. The clear intent is to benefit hunters, not those who otherwise enjoy wildlife, as Spraker suggests. And many of those hunters are urban dwellers and nonresidents, not rural subsistence users.

Is predator control based on sound science? Not according to hundreds of scientists who twice contacted the governor and asked to re-evaluate the scientific basis of the program. And not according to a professional society of biologists that three times opposed the program.

Are the methods of reducing predators widely accepted? Not unless people think killing young wolf pups in dens with poison gas and shooting young bear cubs or mothers with cubs is OK. Many people oppose aerial shooting, but each winter more than one hundred private pilots obtain permits to do it. Snaring of bears is so controversial that it has never before been legal.

Is predator control necessary, indeed mandated by the Constitution and state law as proponents claim? Quite the contrary. Alaska has had abundant wildlife in the past without declaring war on predators. During the eight-year administration of Tony Knowles, there were no active predator control programs, yet hunters took about the same number of moose that they take now.

Many Alaskans support abundant wildlife populations of all species, including predators, but oppose poorly justified, large-scale programs using highly controversial methods. Let's tell Spraker and the Board of Game that they went way too far. We don't need and don't want a war on predators. That brand of wildlife management failed throughout the world many years ago, and we don't need to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Vic Van Ballenberghe

Anchorage

Back to the Current Events menu

 

© Wolf Song of Alaska

wolfsong@alaska.com
IRS Classification 501(c)(3)
Federal ID #92-0127397

The Wolf Song of Alaska logo, web site text and photos are copyrighted, registered, and protected, and cannot be used without permission.  Photos by Monty Sloan, Tom and Maria Talasz.

Web design and artwork donated by Maria Talasz, She-Wolf Works

Visitor Number... Site Meter Paw

 

 

Editorials / Opinions
Editorials/Opinions