Wolf Song of Alaska News
>>Wolves in General
>>Wolves of Denali
>>Wolves in the Lower 48
>>Wolves in Canada
>>The Mexican Wolf
>>The Red Wolf
>>Wolf Tracking
>>Coyote
>>Fox
>>Dingo
>>Animals Sharing Wolf Habitat
>>Wolfdogs in Alaska
>>Canis lupus familiaris
>>Wolf Poems
>>Wolf Distribution
>>Wolves in Afghanistan
>>Wolves in Africa
>>Wolves in Europe
>>Wolves in China
>>Wolves in Iran
>>Wolves in Japan
>>Wolves in Mongolia
>>Wolves in Tasmania
>>Wolves in South Asia
>>Wolves in Scandinavia
>>Wolves in Russia
>>Wolves in South America
>>Wolves Where???
>>Feral Children
>>Miscellaneous Topics
>>Wolf Academy
>>Wolves & Humans
>>Predator & Prey
>>Wolves & Native Americans
>>Wolves for Kids
>>Wolves & Folklore
>>Wolves in Business
>>Wolves in Religion
>>Wolves in War
>>Wolves in Games
>>Wolves in the Arts
>>The Wolf in Fiction
>>Wolves in Medicine

spacer

 

Help the McNeil Bear Sanctuary off linmits to hunting


Abundance-Based Fish, Game Management Can Benefit All

Compass / Anchorage Daily News / February 21, 2009

There was a time in America's history when natural resources were so abundant that the thought of ever depleting them seemed absurd. However, with the Industrial Revolution and increased human population, it became obvious that people not only were capable of harming the environment, they were doing so at an alarming rate. As we depleted our resources, competition to exploit the few remaining resources predictably escalated.

From these excesses was born an awakening that came to be known as the conservation movement.

Under the guidance of great visionaries such as Teddy Roosevelt and Gifford Pinchot, we began a process of conserving and restoring our once-great natural resources. Fundamental to the conservation model was the concept of managing on a sustained yield basis.

Sustained yield is the application of time-tested agricultural principles to the natural environment. In his 1933 book, "Game Management," Aldo Leopold, one of the founders of modern wildlife management, defined game management as "the art of making land produce sustained annual crops of wild game for recreational use."

Some 25 years later, as the framers of Alaska's constitution contemplated the proper management of Alaska's vast natural resources, they took the sustained yield principle to a new level. Not only would they protect these precious assets for future generations, they would do so for the maximum benefit of Alaska's people (Article VIII, Sections 1-4).

Upon this foundation, the concept of abundance-based management was built. Such management requires man to work with the land to produce the maximum sustainable yield.

Alaska statutes define intensive management as "measures to enhance, extend, and develop the population to maintain high levels or provide for higher levels of human harvest, including control of predation and prescribed or planned use of fire and other habitat improvement techniques."

Abundance management is also deeply rooted in the culture and traditions of Alaska. Throughout the state, Alaskans rely heavily on the bounty produced by their natural resources. Central to these traditions is the premise that mankind has not only the ability but also the obligation to manipulate natural systems for the benefit of people, as well as the benefit of the resource itself.

Naturally, when resources become scarce, increased competition for the remaining resources exacerbates the challenge. Throw in rising energy costs and high unemployment and the stage is set for impassioned human conflict, as well as further resource depletion. This is precisely why management of our renewable resources (especially fish and game) to produce abundance is so important.

It has been said, "A rising tide raises all ships." When properly applied, abundance-based fish and game management benefits all user groups.
So how do we properly apply the concept?

The first step is to identify the species and populations we need to increase. Next we identify the environmental resistance inhibiting the growth/maintenance of the population (e.g., weather, poor habitat, over-hunting, predation, etc.). Finally we initiate a plan to mitigate the identified resistance to the extent possible.

A well-conceived plan defines the measure(s) of success, provides for user access and may involve the manipulation of several factors and employ several techniques simultaneously. Selecting these techniques must always consider humaneness, selectivity, efficiency and cost effectiveness. While some techniques are more controversial than others, all are management tools and should be used properly.

Reducing wolves should never become a war on wolves any more than harvesting moose should become a war on moose. It is important to remember that moose are to wolves what vegetation is to moose -- food.

As we manage for abundance, we must realize that if we have more moose than the habitat can support, we must reduce the number of moose or increase the habitat or both. The same is true of moose and wolves. All are important components within the abundance management concept.

Abundance management embodies the realization that humans are not merely intruders in the environment, nor are they merely guardians. The role of humans should be one of thoughtful intervention to produce abundant and sustainable populations of fish and game for all to enjoy.

Corey Rossi is assistant commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish & Game.

Back to the Current Events menu

 

© Wolf Song of Alaska

wolfsong@alaska.com
IRS Classification 501(c)(3)
Federal ID #92-0127397

The Wolf Song of Alaska logo, web site text and photos are copyrighted, registered, and protected, and cannot be used without permission.  Photos by Monty Sloan, Tom and Maria Talasz.

Web design and artwork donated by Maria Talasz, She-Wolf Works

Visitor Number... Site Meter Paw

 

 

Editorials / Opinions
Editorials/Opinions