Wolf Song of Alaska News


Predator Control Limitations Likely to be Shot Down

MEASURE 2: Initiative would ban most aerial hunts of bears, wolves.

By MARY PEMBERTON
The Associated Press

Anchorage Daily News / August 27, 2008

 

Alaskans were saying no Tuesday to a ballot initiative designed to end the state's predator control program as now conducted.

With almost 60 percent of the vote tallied, the measure was losing with more than 56 percent of voters saying no.

Ballot Measure 2 would have prohibited the shooting of wolves and bears either from the air or once a plane has landed, unless the commissioner of the Alaska Department of Fish and Game finds that a "biological emergency" exists and has adequate scientific proof.

The measure defined a biological emergency as one in which a prey population will irreversibly decline unless aircraft are used to reduce the number of wolves and bears.

It also would have required state employees to conduct predator control. Now, private citizens are permitted to kill the animals.

The initiative also would have allowed only the minimum number of predators to be removed to end the emergency.
The state's predator control program, begun in McGrath in 2003 and now operating in five areas of Alaska, is designed to help boost moose and caribou numbers where residents say game has become too scarce.
Under the program, more than 800 wolves have been killed and a far smaller number of bears.

Supporters of the state's predator control program say it is doing some good, bringing much-needed relief to rural residents at a time when the cost of living in Bush Alaska is skyrocketing with the prices for food and fuel.

Opponents say the program, approved by the state Board of Game, thwarts the will of the people, who have twice voted to undo similar programs where aircraft were used to track and kill predators.

Opponents also say the program caters to big game hunters and guides from urban areas, mostly Anchorage and Fairbanks, by manipulating game populations unnecessarily.

No one needs moose and caribou meat so much that wolves and bears need to be shot from the air, said Breffny Conley, 48, of Chugiak, as he prepared to vote.

"I think it is morally wrong. That is a sport for cowards," he said. "God gives us things on earth that you can work for or steal. That's stealing."

Before Alaska statehood in 1959, shooting wolves from airplanes was common. Aerial sport hunting was banned in 1972 but the law allowed aerial shooting for predator control.

In 1996 and 2000, voters rejected using aircraft to help track and kill wolves. The legislature overturned the measures.

Lin Halterman, an antique appraiser in Chugiak, said she voted in favor of the initiative because she thinks when it comes to predator control the Alaska Department of Fish and Game has too much power.

"The trouble with too much control is too much control," she said.

John Orr, 64, of Anchorage, said he voted no on all four ballot initiatives because he doesn't think voters should have to decide such issues. That's what legislators are for, he said.

"They are letting us down on the job," he said.

However, voting no on Ballot Measure 2 was easy, he said.

"There is no shortage of wolves and bears," Orr said.

His wife, Maria, said she also voted no, pointing to the motorist who last Friday hit a large grizzly bear as it crossed one of the city's busiest highways.

"It showed me they are way too close in town. This is our natural habitat," she said. "We can share the land without them overrunning us."

 

Alaska / Voters Choose to Continue Aerial Hunting of Wolves and Bears

Ballot Measure Results with 429 of 438 Precincts Reporting

Last update: 8/27/2008 8:55 am

1: Gambling

Yes     63,330  38%
No      102,174 61%

2: Aerial Hunting

Yes     73,837  44%
No      92,444  55%

3: Campaign funding

Yes     58,026  35%
No      105,682 64%

4: Clean water

Yes     71,456  42%
No      95,338  57%

Back to the Current Events menu

 

Visitor Number... Site Meter Paw

 

 

Editorials / Opinions
Editorials/Opinions