Wolf Song of Alaska News


Board of Game Delays Decisions on Predator Control

Tim Mowry / Fairbanks Daily News-Miner / March 6, 2008

It may be a hot-button issue, but the Alaska Board of Game has put predator control on the back burner thus far during its 11-day meeting in Fairbanks.

The seven-member board has deferred several proposals dealing with predator control to future meetings and tabled another until later in this meeting, which runs through Monday.

Part of the reason the game board has set aside proposals dealing with predator control is a ballot initiative in August in which Alaskans will vote on whether to shoot down the state's aerial wolf control programs, which are being carried out by private pilots and gunners with permits from the state. The initiative would allow only Department of Fish and Game personnel to shoot wolves in "biological emergencies." Similar initiatives were passed by Alaskan voters in 1996 and 2000.

There's no sense in creating new predator control areas if those areas will be eliminated in six months, board members said.

It was for that reason that the board voted Wednesday to defer a proposal to implement a new predator control program in Unit 21E on the lower Yukon River to its November meeting. The board also voted to table a proposal to terminate the aerial predator control program around McGrath until later in the meeting, possibly today.

That move came after the board's legal expert, Kevin Saxby, instructed the board to discuss the arguments in the proposal in detail on the record in the event of a lawsuit.

Tom Banks, the Alaska representative for Defenders of Wildlife, which submitted proposals to terminate three of the state's aerial wolf control programs due to lack of adequate data, said the predator control areas identified by the department are too big and more scientific information is needed to justify the programs. The department has relied on inadequate biological data, as well as anecdotal accounts, to institute the programs and doesn't have the money to compile adequate data, he said.

"The areas (the state) has identified for predator control are too large to manage properly, and the department hasn't been given the money to conduct the kind of research that will truly show these programs are justified," said Banks, who is attending the Fairbanks meeting. "The data is lacking, and where the data is lacking there's not the public support."

The pending ballot initiative also is part of the reason why the game board deferred controversial proposals on killing bears and wolves in their dens to the same meeting.

"No one knows how this initiative is going to unfold," said board member Ted Spraker, who is from Soldotna. "If the department loses the ability to manage wolves using aerial shooters, these may be some of the tools we keep in place."

But chairman Cliff Judkins said it wasn't just the looming initiative that prompted the board to defer the proposals to allow the killing of bears and wolves in their dens, a practice that has long been used by Natives in the Koyukuk River country.

"The reason we want to keep bear denning on the table is because it's a customary and traditional method used by Alaska Natives for years," Judkins said. "We ought to pay attention to these traditions and allow it where we can.

"It doesn't have to be about predator control."

The game board also rejected several proposals that would have allowed bear trapping in some Interior game management units, though Judkins asked the department to provide a more in-depth study on bear trapping at its November meeting in Juneau.

"Something that's more than, 'No, we don't want to do it,'" Judkins said.

Fairbanks board member Dick Burley isn't a big fan of bear trapping - "It doesn't seem like a good idea," he said - but Spraker, like Judkins, wants the department to examine it more closely. Bear trapping is a common practice in Maine and parts of Canada and could be an effective tool in reducing the number of bears in specific areas, he said.

"I'd like to see it done in a very controlled program with the department working directly with individuals," Spraker said. "I'm concerned if we open it too wide that we may have some problems with it."

Some of those problems include catching sows with cubs and the potential for meat spoilage, he said.

"Everybody that testified said that gas is so expensive (in the Bush) now that it makes me wonder how often they're going to check their traps," he said.

The game board is expected to take up proposals dealing with the Tok, Delta Junction and Fairbanks areas today.

Back to the Current Events menu

 

© Wolf Song of Alaska

Visitor Number... Site Meter Paw

 

 

Editorials / Opinions
Editorials/Opinions